S100 Computers

Home S-100 Boards History New Boards Software Boards For Sale
Forum Other Web Sites News Index    
 
CompuPro - History

Compupro Logo

CompuPro started out as a company call Godbout Electronics founded by one of the legends of the early micro-computer era, Bill Godbout.  Unlike some of the other S-100 computer founders Bill had quite a bit of experience in building and selling computer/electronic equipment. He started in the business working as a manager and buyer for a guy named Mike Quinn who had a legendry electronics equipment store near Oakland Airport in California. Mike's store in the early 70's was a hive of activity where pioneers in the field like Lee Felsenstein, Bob Marsh  & Gordon French (Processor Tech) , George Morrow (ThinkerToys, Morrow Designs) , Chuck Grant & Mark Greenberg (Northstar Computers) , Howard Fulmer  (Equinox-100), Brent Wright (Fulcrum)  and many others hung out.  Eventually Bill started his own mail order business in the early 1970's selling electronic experimenter kits.  He setup in the building behind Mike Quinn -- thereby always being in contact with new products, ideas and people. 
 
Bill started in the S-100 board business in 1976 by selling RAM memory boards out of his Godbout Electronics mail order business. His contacts and experience in getting chips fast and at good prices help him get going quickly and allowed Godbout Electronics to fill a market need for boards that Altair, IMASI and even Processor Technologies could not meet in those early days.  In the end Godbout/CopmuPro had more different types of S-100 RAM boards than anybody else in the business. All their boards were static RAM boards. As the business grew the evolved into most other S-100 board types eventually putting together complete S-100 systems. Their S-100 boxes were arguably the most solid and reliable ever made. His innovative products played a large part in the success of the S-100. Bill played a major role in setting the specs for the S-100 bus IEEE-696 standard, being one of its authors.

8-16 Box

CompuPro made a number of complete systems over the years.  The CompuPro 8/16 came in various forms of capability and probably represented the best example of a S-100 boards cooperating with each other. It was one of the last commercial systems to come out for the S-100 bus. There are still some of these boxes around still working! At a late point in the companies history CompuPro started to call themselves Viasyn.  Late boards were labeled with this name.

The CompuPro 8/16 was probably the last commercial system to come out for the S-100 that was marketed to both hobbyists and commercial users in the mid to  late 1980s.  However like Cromemco, Compupro designed and sold even more advanced systems based on the S-100 bus to commercial users up until they went out of business in 1990/91. These systems were of little interest to hobbyists because of their extreme cost, and the fact they were primarily designed to support connections to multiple users each working at a “dumb terminal”.

A note of caution: some of the later Viasyn boards and systems were run without the voltage regulators on the boards. Instead, 5V was supplied on a non-standard S-100 bus.  If you put these boards into a standard S-100 system without the regulators reattached, you will fry the board IC's.

Sounds Magazine Pdf ((hot)) Here

Archival issues of the British music weekly Sounds can be found on sites like World Radio History and the Internet Archive, while modern production magazines like Sound on Sound offer free sample PDFs. To create a new, interactive digital magazine, utilize tools like Canva for design, followed by platforms such as Flipping Book to convert files into interactive flipbooks. For a guide on creating an interactive flipbook, watch this video YouTube. How To Create an Interactive PDF Flipbook Step-by-Step


1. If you mean the UK music newspaper Sounds (1970s–80s)

Sounds was a weekly rival to NME and Melody Maker, famous for covering punk, metal (early Metallica, NWOBHM), and goth rock.

How to find PDFs:

"Solid post" example: If you're referring to a specific well-regarded article (e.g., the first-ever interview with The Smiths, or a classic punk feature), try searching:

Preparing Text from PDFs

If you already have PDFs and want to prepare or extract the text:

  1. Copy and Paste: For simple text extraction, you can try copying and pasting directly from the PDF into a text editor or word processor. However, this method might not work well if the PDF is image-based or if the OCR hasn’t been done properly.

  2. Use OCR Software: As mentioned, using OCR software on your PDFs can convert any image-based text into editable text.

  3. Online OCR Tools: There are also online tools and services that offer OCR for free or by subscription. These can be useful if you don’t have access to dedicated software.

Where to Find Legitimate Sounds Magazine PDFs

Let’s get straight to the point: Copyright law complicates PDF distribution. Sounds magazine’s rights are now owned by various entities (originally Spotlight, later United Newspapers, and now possibly Bauer Media or archived holdings). However, several legitimate or semi-legitimate sources offer scans.

Introduction: A Lost Era of Music Journalism

For music enthusiasts born after the year 2000, the phrase "Sounds magazine PDF" might seem like a cryptic relic. But for those who grew up in the 1970s and 1980s, Sounds was not just another weekly music paper—it was the bible of punk, metal, and alternative rock. Alongside NME and Melody Maker, Sounds carved out a unique identity. It was grittier, louder, and unapologetically devoted to the fringes of rock music. sounds magazine pdf

Today, physical copies of Sounds are rare collectibles, often fetching high prices on auction sites. However, thanks to dedicated archivists and digital preservation projects, the elusive Sounds magazine PDF has become a treasure trove for researchers, nostalgic fans, and young music historians. This article will explore the history of the magazine, why its PDF versions are in high demand, where to find legitimate digital copies, and how to get the most out of these historical documents.

Deep Essay — Sounds Magazine (pdf)

Sounds magazine, a pioneering UK weekly music paper launched in 1970, played a pivotal role in documenting and shaping rock, punk, metal, and alternative music cultures through the 1970s and 1980s. This essay analyzes Sounds’ editorial stance, cultural impact, stylistic innovations, and its eventual decline, drawing on archived PDF issues as primary sources to illustrate how the magazine both reflected and influenced music scenes.

Introduction Sounds emerged at a moment when popular music journalism was expanding beyond fan fanzines and mainstream glossy weeklies. Aimed at serious music fans and musicians, its reporting combined concert reviews, scene-focused features, musician interviews, and record coverage with a gritty visual identity. Sounds’ weekly cadence allowed it to respond rapidly to new movements—crucial during the late-1970s punk explosion and the early-1980s emergence of heavy metal subcultures.

Editorial stance and voice Sounds cultivated an authoritative yet populist voice. Unlike either celebrity-focused monthlies or the countercultural idealism of some underground zines, Sounds balanced critical seriousness with street-level immediacy. Its writers—many future notable critics—favored direct, unsentimental prose that foregrounded live performance and musicianship. The editorial policy privileged new bands and regional scenes, giving early coverage to acts that mainstream outlets ignored. Analysis of period PDFs shows consistent attention to guitar-centric genres, technical musicianship, and the energy of live gigs, often presented through vivid, sometimes confrontational review copy.

Documenting punk and post-punk The late 1970s were transformative for British music; Sounds was among the first weeklies to treat punk not as a fad but as a cultural force. PDFs from 1976–79 demonstrate the magazine’s rapid shift from skeptical curiosity to engaged chronicling: interviews with emergent punk acts, detailed gig reviews in small venues, and photo spreads capturing the movement’s aesthetic. Sounds’ coverage helped legitimize punk’s DIY ethics and regional variations—Manchester, Liverpool, and London scenes receive sustained attention—while also tracing punk’s fragmentation into post-punk experimentalism. The magazine’s critics debated punk’s artistic merits, producing dialectical pieces that both celebrated rawness and called for musical evolution.

Championing New Wave of British Heavy Metal (NWOBHM) and metal subcultures Sounds is widely credited with catalyzing the NWOBHM through enthusiastic coverage and crucial features such as the “Heavy Metal” sections and the famed “Best Guitarist” polls. PDFs from the late 1970s and early 1980s reveal frequent columns, demo round-ups, and reader letters that built a participatory metal community. Unlike mainstream outlets that marginalised metal as juvenile, Sounds framed it as skilled, legitimate, and worthy of analysis. The magazine’s endorsement boosted local bands into national consciousness and influenced record-label scouting and touring networks.

Visual culture and design The magazine’s visual language—bold headlines, live-action photography, gritty black-and-white spreads, and hand-drawn logos—matched its editorial urgency. Analysis of PDFs shows a layout strategy that prioritized immediacy: large concert photos, energetic typography, and placement of band portraits to foreground attitude. This design reinforced the magazine’s identity as a document of subcultures rooted in performance and style, and shaped how readers perceived authenticity in music.

Journalistic innovation and writerly influence Sounds served as a training ground for journalists who later shaped mainstream music criticism. Its writers combined reportage, criticism, and personality-driven columns, creating a model for later weeklies and monthlies. The magazine experimented with reader engagement—polls, demo submissions, and localized gig listings—helping forge a two-way relationship between press and audience. PDFs show that editorial pages often blended fact-based reviews with subjective, evocative writing, expanding the scope of what music journalism could be.

Cultural politics and controversies The magazine navigated cultural conflicts—gender representation, commercialization, and artist behavior—sometimes controversially. While Sounds elevated many male-dominated guitar acts, its coverage of women musicians and nonconformist identities was uneven, reflecting broader industry biases. Editorial decisions, such as sensational headlines or ranking polls, occasionally provoked backlash from readers and artists. Examining letters pages and editorials in PDF archives illuminates these tensions and shows the magazine as both a mirror and an active participant in cultural debates. Archival issues of the British music weekly Sounds

Economic pressures and decline By the mid-1980s and into the 1990s, shifts in music consumption, competition from glossy monthlies and emerging broadcast outlets, and financial constraints eroded Sounds’ influence. PDFs document shrinking page counts, shifts in paper quality, and editorial reorientations toward broader, less scene-specific coverage. The decline reflects broader media industry trends: consolidation, rising production costs, and changing reader habits as visual music television and, later, digital platforms supplanted weeklies’ gatekeeping role.

Legacy and archival value Despite its closure, Sounds’ archive—now partly available in scanned PDF form—remains indispensable for music historians. The week-by-week record preserves scene timelines, first-press interviews, concert chronologies, and contemporaneous reception that are often absent from retrospective narratives. Researchers value Sounds for its immediacy: the magazine captured first responses rather than retrospective mythmaking. PDFs therefore function as primary documents for studying punk, metal, regional music economies, and the evolution of music journalism.

Conclusion Sounds magazine’s trajectory—from an incisive weekly to an archival treasure—illustrates how periodical journalism can both shape and record cultural movements. Its committed coverage of live music, embrace of emerging genres, and visceral design ethos made it a central node in late-20th-century British music culture. PDFs of its issues preserve not only music history but also a model of engaged, scene-driven journalism whose influence persists in contemporary music writing and fan communities.

Suggested next steps for a PDF-based study

Bibliography and sources (Use the Sounds PDF archive and related music journalism histories for primary and secondary sources.)

Title: The Resonant Page: Exploring the Value and Legacy of Sounds Magazine PDFs

In the evolution of music journalism, few publications have captured the raw energy and cultural shifting of the rock era as vividly as Sounds. Active from 1970 to 1991, this British music paper was more than just a trade publication; it was a weekly bible for fans of rock, punk, heavy metal, and new wave. Today, the phrase "Sounds magazine PDF" represents more than a file format; it signifies a crucial archival bridge connecting the analog past to the digital present. Through the digitization of these publications, the legacy of Sounds has been preserved, offering historians, musicians, and fans a high-fidelity window into a transformative era of music history.

To understand the importance of the Sounds magazine PDF archive, one must first appreciate the stature of the publication itself. Sounds was the first weekly music paper to use glossy color covers, a tactical innovation that allowed it to stand out on newsstands against its rivals, the New Musical Express (NME) and Melody Maker. However, its true value lay in its editorial voice. While its competitors often focused on the intellectual and avant-garde aspects of music, Sounds was unapologetically populist and gritty. It was the first to champion the burgeoning punk movement with the famous "God Save the Sex Pistols" cover, and later became the spiritual home of the New Wave of British Heavy Metal (NWOBHM). For a generation, Sounds was the primary source for discovering bands like Iron Maiden, Def Leppard, and The Jam.

The transition of these weekly papers into the realm of the PDF (Portable Document Format) has revolutionized how we interact with music history. In the pre-digital age, accessing back issues required physical travel to specialized libraries or the expensive purchase of deteriorating paper copies. The advent of PDF archives has democratized this access. A digital archive allows a student in Tokyo or a musician in New York to instantly retrieve a review of a 1977 Clash gig or a 1982 interview with Motörhead. This accessibility ensures that the cultural impact of the magazine is not lost to time or the fragility of newsprint. WorldRadioHistory

Furthermore, the PDF format offers a unique advantage over simple text transcripts: it preserves the visual context of the era. A Sounds magazine PDF retains the original layout, typography, and advertising. This is crucial because the advertisements are often as historically significant as the articles. Flipping through a digital issue, a reader sees promo shots of bands in their prime, vintage equipment ads, and announcements for long-forgotten gigs at venues like the Marquee Club or the Rainbow Theatre. This visual immersion provides a holistic understanding of the period, allowing the reader to grasp the aesthetic and atmosphere that purely textual databases cannot convey.

The existence of Sounds in digital formats also serves a vital purpose in correcting historical revisionism. Music history is often romanticized or simplified in retrospect. Reading the contemporary reviews and interviews in Sounds provides an unfiltered snapshot of how music was actually received at the moment of release. A modern listener might assume a now-classic album was immediately revered, but a PDF archive might reveal a scathing contemporary review or a skeptical assessment of a band’s early potential. This raw, immediate journalism provides invaluable insight for researchers and critics seeking to understand the true trajectory of popular music.

However, the prevalence of "Sounds magazine PDF" searches also highlights a tension between preservation and copyright. Much of this digitization has been driven by fan communities and unofficial archivists rather than the publishers themselves. While this shadow archiving has saved a wealth of information that might have otherwise turned to dust, it exists in a legal gray area. It underscores the responsibility of media organizations to maintain their own digital legacies, ensuring that the work of legendary writers like Giovanni Dadomo and Betty Page remains accessible legally and sustainably.

In conclusion, the digitization of Sounds magazine represents a triumph of cultural preservation. It transforms a collection of fragile, decaying newsprint into a permanent, searchable resource. For the music historian, it is a database of facts and figures; for the fan, it is a time machine. As the physical artifacts of the 20th-century music press continue to degrade, the PDF stands as the definitive vessel for the ink, attitude, and amplification that defined Sounds magazine. It ensures that the voice that once championed punk and metal continues to resonate in the digital age.

How to Read and Preserve Your Sounds Magazine PDF Collection

Once you’ve acquired your sounds magazine pdf files, proper management is key.

How to Search for Specific Sounds Articles

General search strings often fail. To find a specific Sounds article or review, use advanced operators. Example:

"Geoff Barton" "Sounds" filetype:pdf

Or, if you know the approximate date:

"Sounds magazine" February 1981 PDF

You can also combine search terms with the site:archive.org operator.

his page was last modified on 05/20/2020